![]() The same applies for example to former Soviet destroyer Fushun, which is on the same tier as her sister Gnevny in the Russian tech tree. On the other hand for example the Fletcher class destroyer Chung Mu is on the same tier as USS Fletcher in the American branch, because she was passed to her new owners basically in the same 1945 armament configuration. One of the questions I think a lot of people will have is, as this is a tree made out of ships that were essentially "passed on" to other nations, as the original navies perhaps didn't want them anymore, or they'd reached the end of their service life, is that going to make them any less able in game?ĭefinitely not! They are pretty good all-round gunboats and they are also put in appropriate tiers - for example the Tier IV, Shenyang, is a tier lower than her sister ships already in game (Minekaze class) because of her slightly less capable armament. Large parts of the line are large destroyer classes (for their time), or even on tier V belong to the "Destroyer Leader" category. Since the top tiers were quite naturally former US destroyers with their all-rounder armament and good guns, we wanted the rest of the line to reflect that. ![]() With none of the ships being built by the countries they're now sailing under, how do you go about choosing which ships to include, and bringing together several different navies, and styles of ship building, into a tree that makes sense?Īs having large differences in play style is not ideal, we had to choose ships that would be at least remotely similar despite being from different paths of life. The Pan Asian destroyer tree looks set to be one of the most unusual trees in the game, as it's a real mish-mash of ships from different countries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |